🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's security policy document offers a misguided view of Europe. It claims that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" policies represent an existential threat to European civilization. However, this perspective is based on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The actual challenge facing Europe is not societal but economic and technological lag.

The Stark Growth Gap Separating Europe and the US

The data reveal a stark picture. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by 87%, compared to a mere 13.5% increase for the European Union. During this period, EU GDP per capita fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the American figure. Strikingly, even Mississippi now boasts a greater average income than major European economies like France and Italy.

Currently, roughly 50% of the world’s top fifty technology firms are American, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Technological Deficit: A Critical Question

The growing disparity stems from superior productivity growth in the United States, largely due to breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology dominance is decidedly American. Over the past five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, compared with only fourteen in the European continent.

This gap raises a vital issue: In the race for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, where does the EU stand? Experts widely agree it is largely a two-horse race between the United States and China, with European nations entering at a clear handicap.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Technological Lag

Several major reasons explain this innovation chasm.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and agile network for financing new ventures. Europe has yet to establish a genuine capital markets union, a factor that limits the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented regulation hinder Europe. A US startup can launch a service under one regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 different national regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Mindset Differences: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with penalties, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a badge of experience.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its capacity for pioneering research.

A Path Forward: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, one can find reasons for hope. European leaders are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have begun to advance serious reform. Key analyses on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of major reforms.

With the right policies and regulatory reforms, these assets might enable much higher degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

The continent retains considerable advantages: high-quality human capital, top-tier education systems, and world-class labs. Coupled with a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to trigger a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if the EU does not become the leader in developing next-generation tech, it can still significantly increase productivity by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now faces a critical crossroads. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". So far, Europe's technological decline has been steady. However, without bold steps to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a sudden and irreversible decline in world influence.